Helldivers 3: Arrowhead CCO Says the Sequel Is Not in Development
By Indie Kings | October 26, 2026
Updated October 26, 2026: Helldivers 3 is not in development, according to Arrowhead chief creative officer Johan Pilestedt, and the reasoning is a genuine design position rather than a licensing dodge: a sequel would be Helldivers 2's own biggest competitor, he said, in comments that also sketch what the studio is actually building instead.
Image: military units conducting a field training exercise via Wikimedia Commons.
The answer and the reasoning
Pilestedt's position, as reported by handheld.guru crediting VGC reporting, is that Helldivers 3 is not in development today. The argument attached to it is more interesting than the fact, because most live service studios hedge with a version of no, nothing to announce. He framed a hypothetical Helldivers 3 directly against the incumbent: the sequel would compete with the game the studio already has, splitting the player base between two versions of the same democratization of managed democracy. This is the counter position to the industry's standing habit, in which every successful cooperative shooter gets sequenced into obsolescence every three or four years, taking its community with it in migration and leaving the servers of the predecessor behind.
Where Arrowhead's people are
The staffing picture backs the statements up. About 95 percent of Arrowhead's staff are on Helldivers 2, which is what a culture of live service looks like on an org chart: the actual game absorbs the studio, and the pipeline is fed by updates rather than a parallel team. The exception is the prototype: the studio has a prototype of a separate new game that is explicitly stated not to be Helldivers 3, so curiosity about Arrowhead's next thing is allowed but should not be resolved as a sequel. Also worth noting the caveat that this is all statements reported by an outlet and not studio documentation, so figures like the 95 percent staffing split are attributed claims rather than audited facts.
Eternal service as the endgame
The most specific comment was about the franchise's intended lifespan. Pilestedt described the goal as a long lived service in the manner of persistent toy and game systems, using Lego or Warhammer as the comparison, an eternal service in his phrasing. The analogy matters because both of those named systems are decades old ecosystems whose appeal compounds rather than resets: nobody waits for Lego 2 or Warhammer 3 as a replacement that obsoletes the bricks and armies already on the shelf, they just keep buying into the one they have. Purpose built phrasing aside, for a live shooter that is the difference between a game that dies when the sequel ships and a game that could keep generating content until the engine itself retires, since the player base is never deliberately abandoned on a schedule.
Statement card
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Who | Johan Pilestedt, Arrowhead chief creative officer |
| Claim | Helldivers 3 is not in development |
| Reasoning | A sequel would be Helldivers 2's own biggest competitor, per Pilestedt |
| Staffing | About 95 percent of Arrowhead staff are working on Helldivers 2 |
| Side project | A prototype of a separate game exists, explicitly not Helldivers 3 |
| Long term vision | An eternal service in the manner of Lego or Warhammer |
| Attribution | handheld.guru coverage crediting VGC, October 2026 |
FAQ
Is Helldivers 3 in development?
Not currently, according to Arrowhead's chief creative officer Johan Pilestedt, in remarks reported by VGC.
Why not make a sequel?
Pilestedt argued a Helldivers 3 would be Helldivers 2's own biggest competitor, splitting the community and the studio's efforts between two versions of the same game.
What is the studio actually working on?
About 95 percent of Arrowhead's staff are on Helldivers 2, with a prototype of a separate new game that is explicitly not Helldivers 3.
What is the long term plan for the franchise?
A long lived service in the manner of Lego or Warhammer, described by Pilestedt as an eternal service with no scheduled obsolescence.
Should the 95 percent figure be taken precisely?
Treat it as an attributed statement from the coverage rather than an audited org chart detail.
Does this mean the franchise ends with 2?
Not necessarily his position: the framing suggests ongoing evolution of Helldivers 2 rather than a third numbered game, with any new prototype being a separate project.
Bottom Line
Not making Helldivers 3 is the rarest thing a successful studio can decide: it declines the largest revenue pool in its own genre because the sequel would sell the audience out of the home it already has. The Lego and Warhammer comparison is the strongest part of the statement, because it names a business model in which content compounds instead of resetting, and every succeeding update extends the shelf life of everything a player already owns. If the 95 percent staffing claim holds, the decision is not aspirational but structural, and the prototype of a separate game suggests the studio's appetite for something new is being routed into original work rather than a franchise reset.
Sources
- handheld.guru, Pilestedt remarks, staffing split and prototype framing, October 2026
- VGC as the credited reporting outlet
Related: Phantom Blade Zero: Analyst Counts 500,000 Steam Sales Before Launch | Netflix Xbox Deal: $500M Offer for Xbox Games Fell Apart